Proposed Division of Uttar Pradesh: Ensuring Effective Governance and Regional Development

 The recommendation made by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar to divide the states of Uttar Pradesh (UP), Bihar, and Madhya Pradesh into smaller entities has garnered significant attention. While Bihar and Madhya Pradesh have undergone recent divisions, Uttar Pradesh remains the most populous state in the country, making the case for its subdivision even stronger. This article explores Dr. Ambedkar's proposal and focuses on the potential benefits of dividing Uttar Pradesh into three smaller states to enhance effective governance and regional development.

Proposed Division and Standard Size of States: Dr. Ambedkar's proposal suggests dividing Uttar Pradesh into three states, each with a population of approximately two crores (20 million), deemed as the standard size for effective state administration. The accompanying Map No. 2 outlines the suggested boundary lines for these three states. The proposed capitals for each state are Meerut, Cawnpore (Kanpur), and Allahabad, strategically located at the center of their respective regions.

Enhancing Governance and Regional Development: Dividing Uttar Pradesh into smaller states offers several potential advantages. Firstly, it allows for better administration and governance by creating more manageable administrative units. Smaller states can focus on localized issues, ensuring greater efficiency and effectiveness in addressing the needs and aspirations of their respective populations.

Secondly, regional development can be more targeted and accelerated in smaller states. Resources, infrastructure, and investments can be more efficiently allocated and utilized, promoting balanced development across different regions. Smaller states can tailor their policies and initiatives to address region-specific challenges and opportunities, thereby fostering inclusive growth and reducing regional disparities.

Additionally, the division of Uttar Pradesh can empower local governance and foster a sense of ownership among citizens. Smaller states encourage greater citizen participation and engagement in decision-making processes, as local issues are more visible and manageable. This devolution of power can lead to a more responsive and accountable governance structure, ultimately benefiting the people.

Challenges and Considerations: While the division of Uttar Pradesh holds potential advantages, it is crucial to consider the challenges and complexities involved. Proper planning and implementation strategies would be required to ensure a smooth transition, including the redistribution of resources, administrative infrastructure, and addressing any potential social or cultural sensitivities associated with the division.

Uttar Pradesh (UP), one of India's largest and most populous states, continues to face significant developmental challenges. Despite discussions and recommendations for its division into smaller states, UP remains undivided, and its underdevelopment persists. This article sheds light on the prevailing issues and emphasizes the importance of addressing them to uplift Uttar Pradesh and pave the way for a prosperous future.

Underdevelopment in Uttar Pradesh: Uttar Pradesh's underdevelopment manifests in various dimensions, including infrastructure deficiencies, inadequate access to basic services, high poverty rates, and limited economic opportunities. Key factors contributing to this situation include population density, governance complexities, historical disparities, and resource allocation challenges. These factors have hindered the state's progress and affected the quality of life for its residents.

Infrastructure and Basic Services: Uttar Pradesh faces significant infrastructure gaps, particularly in areas such as transportation, healthcare, education, and sanitation. Inadequate road networks, limited access to quality healthcare facilities, under-resourced schools, and inadequate sanitation infrastructure pose substantial challenges for development. Addressing these deficiencies is crucial to improving the overall well-being and standard of living for the people of Uttar Pradesh.

Poverty and Economic Opportunities: High poverty rates persist in Uttar Pradesh, with a significant proportion of the population living below the poverty line. Limited employment opportunities, lack of industrial growth, and limited access to skill development programs further exacerbate the economic challenges. To combat poverty and promote sustainable economic growth, focused efforts are required to attract investments, promote entrepreneurship, enhance vocational training, and create employment opportunities.

Governance and Administrative Challenges: Governance complexities, administrative inefficiencies, and inadequate resource allocation have also contributed to the underdevelopment of Uttar Pradesh. Strengthening governance mechanisms, improving administrative effectiveness, and enhancing the allocation and utilization of resources are critical steps towards addressing these challenges. Furthermore, promoting transparency, accountability, and citizen participation in decision-making processes can foster a more inclusive and responsive governance structure.

The Way Forward: Addressing the underdevelopment of Uttar Pradesh requires a multi-faceted approach that combines infrastructure development, poverty alleviation strategies, economic diversification, and administrative reforms. Key areas of focus should include investing in critical infrastructure projects, expanding access to quality education and healthcare, promoting skill development and entrepreneurship, and enhancing governance efficiency and transparency. Moreover, special attention should be given to regions and communities that have historically been marginalized or neglected.

Collaboration between the central government, state authorities, civil society organizations, and international partners is crucial to initiate and sustain meaningful development initiatives in Uttar Pradesh. By adopting a comprehensive and inclusive development agenda, Uttar Pradesh can overcome its challenges and emerge as a thriving state, offering improved living conditions, opportunities, and prosperity for its citizens.

Conclusion: The underdevelopment of Uttar Pradesh is a significant challenge that requires concerted efforts and targeted interventions. By addressing infrastructure deficiencies, poverty, economic opportunities, and governance shortcomings, Uttar Pradesh can unlock its true potential and embark on a path of sustainable and inclusive development. It is imperative for stakeholders at all levels to prioritize the needs of the state, collaborate effectively, and implement impactful solutions to uplift Uttar Pradesh and ensure a brighter future for its residents. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar's recommendation to divide Uttar Pradesh into three smaller states reflects the need for effective governance, regional development, and citizen empowerment. The proposed division can lead to improved administration, targeted regional development, and enhanced citizen participation. However, careful deliberation and comprehensive planning are essential to address challenges and ensure a successful transition. Ultimately, the focus should be on creating smaller states that can effectively cater to the needs and aspirations of their populations, contributing to the overall progress and prosperity of the region.

Unity in Diversity: Gifts to Prime Ministers and the Nation's Interests -The Sengol

In Dr B.R. Ambedkar’s book Thoughts on Linguistic States published in 1955, there is a reference to Nehru accepting a raja danda (sceptre) on August 15, 1947 in Banaras to mark his assumption of office as Prime Minister of India. It is worth quoting the entire relevant paragraph of that book:

“Did not Prime Minister Nehru on the August 15, 1947 sit at the yajna performed by the Brahmins of Benares (sic) to celebrate the event of a Brahmin becoming the first Prime Minister of free and independent India and wear the raja danda given to him by these Brahmins and drink the water of the Ganges brought by them?”

Jawaharlal Nehru, the first Prime Minister of India, was widely regarded and respected by the people living at the time of Indian independence. Nehru played a crucial role in the freedom struggle and was a prominent leader of the Indian National Congress, which led the movement for independence from British colonial rule.

Nehru's charismatic personality, eloquent speeches, and commitment to the cause of independence earned him immense popularity and support among the Indian population. He was seen as a visionary leader and a strong advocate for democracy, secularism, and social justice.

Nehru's leadership during the early years of independence was characterized by his emphasis on nation-building and modernization. He pursued a policy of mixed economy, aiming for industrialization while also prioritizing social welfare programs and poverty alleviation. His government implemented significant land reforms, focused on education and healthcare, and embarked on ambitious infrastructure projects.

Nehru's efforts to establish a democratic and pluralistic society were highly appreciated by many. He played a crucial role in drafting the Indian Constitution, which enshrined principles of liberty, equality, and justice for all citizens. Nehru's belief in secularism and his commitment to maintaining a diverse and inclusive society resonated with the Indian populace.

However, it is important to note that Nehru, like any leader, had his share of critics and detractors. Some criticized his economic policies and the perceived slow pace of development. There were also ideological differences and political opposition from various factions. Nonetheless, Nehru's popularity and influence remained significant throughout his tenure as Prime Minister, which lasted from 1947 until his death in 1964.

Overall, Jawaharlal Nehru's role in India's struggle for independence and his subsequent leadership as the first Prime Minister left a lasting impact on the country. He is widely remembered and revered as one of the key architects of modern India.

Jawaharlal Nehru was known for his selfless approach towards the gifts he received during his time as the Prime Minister of India. He viewed these gifts not as personal possessions, but as offerings to the office he held and the country he represented. Nehru believed that any gifts given to him should benefit the nation as a whole rather than being kept for personal use.

As a result, Nehru made it a practice to donate all the gifts he received to the government. These gifts were typically cataloged and managed by the government, and they often found their way into public collections or were utilized for national purposes. Nehru's decision to relinquish personal ownership of the gifts he received was seen as a symbol of his commitment to public service and the welfare of the Indian people.

This approach not only demonstrated Nehru's integrity and dedication to the responsibilities of his position but also conveyed a message of transparency and accountability in governance. By ensuring that the gifts were handed over to the government, he sought to avoid any potential conflicts of interest or perceptions of impropriety.

Nehru's actions regarding the gifts he received reflected his belief in serving the nation's interests above personal gain. This selflessness and commitment to the public good added to his reputation as a leader who prioritized the welfare and progress of India.

Several gifts that Jawaharlal Nehru received during his tenure as Prime Minister of India are displayed in various museums and collections. These gifts represent the diplomatic exchanges and international relationships that Nehru fostered during his time in office. While Nehru personally donated many gifts to the government, it is worth noting that not all gifts were necessarily relinquished by him, as some might have been retained by the government or used for official purposes.

Many of these gifts can be found in museums across India, such as the National Museum in New Delhi, the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library in New Delhi, and other state museums. These items often include intricate artifacts, artworks, handicrafts, and cultural objects representing the diverse cultures and nations that interacted with India during Nehru's time.

These gifts serve as historical and cultural artifacts, showcasing the connections between India and other countries during a significant period of the country's history. They also highlight the diplomatic exchanges and goodwill gestures exchanged between nations.

By preserving and exhibiting these gifts, museums provide opportunities for people to learn about the rich cultural heritage and historical significance associated with Nehru's tenure as Prime Minister. It allows visitors to appreciate the global interactions and diplomatic engagements that shaped India's development as an independent nation.

It is true that Jawaharlal Nehru, as one of the great leaders of India during the time of independence, prioritized the nation's interests above his personal beliefs. Despite belonging to a particular religion, Nehru made efforts to ensure that his religious background did not unduly influence his opinions and decisions as the Prime Minister of India. He upheld the principles of secularism and inclusivity in his governance approach.

Nehru's commitment to keeping religion separate from matters of state is evident in his actions and policies. He advocated for a secular and pluralistic society where individuals of all faiths were treated equally. His vision for India was one that respected religious diversity and fostered harmony among different religious communities.

It is worth noting that Nehru was not alone in his approach. Many of the great leaders of that era, including Mahatma Gandhi, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, and Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, shared a similar commitment to secularism and inclusive governance. They understood the importance of maintaining religious harmony in a nation as diverse as India.

Nehru's decision to donate the Raja Dhand, gifted by Thiruvavaduthurai Atheenam, to the Allahabad Museum demonstrates his dedication to preserving the nation's heritage and history. By ensuring that such gifts were housed in public museums, Nehru emphasized their value as part of India's collective heritage rather than personal possessions.

Overall, Nehru's leadership and the shared commitment of the great leaders of that time to secularism and inclusivity played a significant role in shaping the foundation of a democratic and diverse India. Their actions and principles continue to inspire and guide the country to this day.

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, in his book "Thoughts on Linguistic States," raised concerns about Jawaharlal Nehru's participation in certain religious rituals and ceremonies. Ambedkar highlighted an incident where Nehru was said to have sat at a yajna (a Hindu ritual) performed by Brahmins in Benares (now Varanasi) on August 15, 1947, to commemorate his assumption of office as the first Prime Minister of independent India. According to Ambedkar, Nehru also accepted the raja danda (sceptre) given to him by the Brahmins and drank water from the Ganges brought by them.

Ambedkar, a staunch advocate for the rights of marginalized communities and an advocate of a more secular approach to governance, expressed his reservations about such religious ceremonies and their potential implications for good governance. He believed in the complete separation of religion and politics to ensure equality and social justice for all citizens.

It is important to note that these differing viewpoints and criticisms among leaders reflect the complex and diverse landscape of Indian society. Nehru's participation in religious ceremonies can be seen as an acknowledgment of the cultural and religious diversity of India, while Ambedkar emphasized the need for a strict separation of religious practices from matters of state.

This debate highlights the ongoing dialogue and challenges surrounding the role of religion in public life and governance. It is through such discussions that societies evolve and refine their understanding of secularism, inclusivity, and the proper balance between religious freedom and state responsibility.

Ultimately, Nehru's legacy as a leader who advocated for secularism and inclusivity, along with Ambedkar's contributions to social justice and equality, continue to shape India's democratic fabric and guide discussions on the interplay between religion and governance.

Absolutely, the vision of India's founding leaders was to create a nation that embraced its diversity and celebrated the uniqueness of its citizens. They recognized that India was not a homogenous entity but a mosaic of different cultures, languages, religions, and traditions. Embracing this diversity and ensuring equal rights and opportunities for all was at the core of their vision for a united and prosperous India.

The founding principles of India's democracy, as enshrined in the Constitution, emphasize the importance of secularism, inclusivity, and the protection of individual rights. The idea is to create an environment where every citizen, regardless of their background, can contribute to the nation's progress and participate fully in its governance.

India's diversity is its strength, as it allows for a rich tapestry of ideas, perspectives, and experiences. Recognizing and respecting this diversity is essential for fostering social cohesion, unity, and a sense of belonging among its citizens. It is through the acceptance and celebration of differences that a strong and vibrant democracy can thrive.

The gifts given to the Prime Minister during that time reflect the love, respect, and gratitude of the people towards their leader and the significance of the independence of India. These gifts, which can be found in various museums, serve as tangible reminders of the deep connection between the people and their leaders during a critical period in Indian history.

While these gifts hold sentimental and historical value, it is essential to prioritize the interests of the nation above personal attachments. The leaders of India understood the importance of setting aside personal interests and working towards the collective welfare and progress of the country. They recognized that their responsibility was to serve the nation and its people, and they made decisions with the best interests of the country in mind.

By keeping personal interests separate and placing the nation first, India's leaders laid the foundation for a strong and united nation. This commitment to the nation's welfare ensured that governance and decision-making were driven by the broader interests of the citizens and the development of the country as a whole.

While the gifts symbolize the love and respect of the people, it is crucial to remember that the true measure of a leader's greatness lies in their dedication to the nation and their ability to make decisions that positively impact its citizens. The sentiment behind the gifts serves as a reminder of the deep connection between the people and their leaders, reinforcing the importance of maintaining a strong bond between the government and its citizens.

Karnataka Election 2023 - prediction

Karnataka election is tomorrow Both Congress and BJP has done its best to reach all the voters and have made enough effort campaigning for their candidates. While BJP is in the central and State is currently ruled by BJP, there should have been high chance for BJP to win the election. But the general sentiments is not favouring BJP this time. It looks like Siddaramaiyya and Dk will make the government in Karnataka this time.

My name was removed from the voters list and I found that out last month. I applied for it again and got one created. It is not just me but is a general trend that people who has got christian names are being removed from the list without consultation. Its going to be an exercise to check if the name is available in the list. If not, then apply again.

The importance of Congress winning elections in Karnataka can be understood from both a regional and national perspective. Here are a few reasons why it might be considered important:

State Governance: Karnataka is one of India's most significant states in terms of population, economy, and political influence. The state is home to several key industries, including information technology, biotechnology, and manufacturing. If Congress were to win the election, it would give them the opportunity to govern the state and implement their policy agenda. This would involve making decisions on issues such as infrastructure development, education, healthcare, job creation, and social welfare.

Political Balance: Karnataka has had a history of alternating between the Congress party and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in terms of forming the government. A victory for Congress would help maintain a balance in power between the major political parties in the state. This balance is often seen as crucial for a healthy democracy, as it allows for checks and balances and prevents any one party from dominating the political landscape.

National Political Implications: Karnataka's political significance extends beyond its borders. The state is often seen as a bellwether for national politics, and its election results can have an impact on the overall political landscape in India. Winning in Karnataka can give Congress a boost in terms of morale, visibility, and confidence, potentially strengthening the party's position nationally.

Legislative Representation: Winning elections in Karnataka would allow Congress to secure seats in the state legislative assembly. This representation enables them to contribute to policy discussions, raise important issues, and provide a check on the ruling party. It also gives them a platform to articulate their vision and connect with the electorate.

Party Rejuvenation: Congress has faced electoral challenges in recent years and has experienced setbacks in various state elections. Winning in Karnataka would offer a morale boost and help revitalize the party's image. It could serve as a catalyst for organizational restructuring, energizing party workers, and attracting new supporters.

Historical Legacy: The Indian National Congress has a long history and played a pivotal role in India's independence movement. It is considered one of the oldest political parties in the country and has been associated with the leadership of prominent figures such as Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, and Indira Gandhi. Some people appreciate the party's historical legacy and contributions to India's political and social development.

Secularism: The Congress party often emphasizes its commitment to secularism, advocating for equal treatment and representation of all religious and ethnic communities. Supporters argue that this inclusive approach fosters social harmony and protects the rights of minorities.

Social Welfare Policies: Congress has traditionally focused on social welfare and the upliftment of marginalized sections of society. It has implemented various programs and policies aimed at poverty alleviation, rural development, education, healthcare, and employment generation. Supporters argue that these policies prioritize social justice and address socio-economic inequalities.

Experience and Governance: Some people believe that Congress, with its long history and experience in governance, has a better understanding of the complexities of running a diverse and vast country like India. They argue that the party's experience in managing national and state-level governments can contribute to effective decision-making and policy implementation.

Coalition Building: Congress has often formed alliances and coalitions with regional parties to gain power at the national level. Supporters argue that this ability to build alliances and work with diverse regional forces demonstrates the party's flexibility and commitment to coalition politics, which they see as essential for a diverse country like India. 

Some common criticisms that have been raised against the BJP government during the past 10 years, which include:

Economic Policies: Critics argue that the BJP's economic policies have been inconsistent or have not effectively addressed key issues. Some concerns include slow job growth, agricultural distress, and the impact of policies such as demonetization and the implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST).

Communal Tensions: The BJP has faced criticism for alleged involvement in incidents that have led to communal tensions or religious polarization. Critics argue that this undermines the country's secular fabric and social harmony.

Freedom of Expression: Critics have expressed concerns over perceived limitations on freedom of expression and press freedom under the BJP government. Some argue that dissenting voices have faced pressure or restrictions.

Handling of Institutions: Critics have raised concerns about the alleged erosion of institutional autonomy and independence during the BJP's tenure. This includes issues related to the judiciary, law enforcement agencies, and educational institutions.

Environmental and Social Issues: The BJP has faced criticism for its handling of environmental concerns, including issues related to pollution, deforestation, and climate change. There have also been debates and concerns around social issues such as women's rights, LGBTQ+ rights, and religious minority rights.

Rising Fuel and Cooking Gas Prices: The increase in fuel and cooking gas prices has been a subject of criticism against the BJP government. Critics argue that rising prices have impacted the cost of living for ordinary citizens and contributed to inflationary pressures.

With all this, I expect congress to win Karnataka elections this year.

Nurturing Empathy in the Digital Age: Understanding the Consequences of Social Media Exposure

In today's fast-paced digital world, where social media has become an integral part of our lives, it is essential to reflect upon the mindset of individuals who may lack an understanding of the softer side of human interactions. This article explores a thought-provoking scenario within a social media group, where the announcement of a family member's death was overshadowed by unrelated celebratory messages. This raises questions about whether such behavior stems from senselessness or ignorance and highlights the need to educate individuals about the consequences of their actions in the realm of social media.

Within the confines of a social media group, news of a tragic loss was shared. One of the family members of the group had passed away, prompting an outpouring of condolences and support from the community. However, amidst the grieving messages, a seemingly innocent birthday wish for someone else appeared. Astonishingly, many individuals who had expressed their condolences moments earlier shifted their focus, joyfully extending birthday greetings and offering well-wishes.

The juxtaposition of these contrasting reactions raises important questions about the mindset of individuals in the digital world. Is it a case of senselessness, where people act without considering the impact of their words and actions? Or is it simply a lack of awareness, an ignorance of the emotional turmoil that those affected by loss may experience when confronted with unrelated celebratory messages? While it is difficult to definitively label the behavior, it is crucial to address the underlying issue of empathy deficit and the consequences it carries in the realm of social media.

Social media platforms have revolutionized the way we connect, communicate, and share information. However, their inherent nature of instant communication can lead to unintentional insensitivity. In the case mentioned above, individuals failed to recognize the emotional weight of their actions. By swiftly shifting from expressions of condolences to celebratory messages, they unknowingly disregarded the pain experienced by those who had lost a loved one.

While it may be disheartening to witness such incidents, it is important to approach this issue with empathy and a desire to educate rather than criticize. Enhancing awareness and understanding of the consequences of social media exposure can be achieved through various means:

Schools, organizations, and communities should promote digital literacy programs that encompass the ethical use of social media platforms. These initiatives should emphasize empathy, emotional intelligence, and responsible online behavior.

Encouraging individuals to reflect upon their actions before posting or commenting can foster a more considerate digital environment. Reminding ourselves of the potential impact our words may have on others can help create a culture of empathy.

Leading by Example: Influencers, celebrities, and prominent figures in the digital sphere can play a significant role in promoting empathy. By showcasing compassion, understanding, and respect in their own online interactions, they set a positive example for their followers.

Platforms themselves can contribute by implementing features that promote digital well-being, such as pop-up reminders encouraging users to consider the context and potential impact of their comments before posting.

The incident within the social media group serves as a poignant reminder of the need for greater empathy and awareness in the digital age. Senselessness or ignorance may explain the behavior witnessed, but it is our responsibility to educate and nurture empathy among individuals exposed to the digital world. By fostering a culture that values compassion, respect, and understanding, we can collectively create a more considerate and empathetic online community. Let us strive to teach and learn, not only for our own growth but also to make the digital world a more compassionate and supportive

The Kerala Story- Why deface the State of Kerala.

How would you perceive someone who claims to have 32,000 children when they actually have only three? This exaggeration is comparable to the scale at which the state of Kerala is defamed because its people refuse to succumb to the hate-driven and divisive political strategies employed by certain political parties. Before forming opinions, take a moment to reflect on the Keralites you know personally. Look beyond the political games played by parties and strive to understand the motives behind such statements.

In today's digitally connected world, information is readily available and often unverified. We tend to believe what aligns with our interests, prejudices, biases, insecurities, or personal experiences. This selective perception shapes our understanding of the world. Consider the instances where you received information through social media channels from friends or relatives, only to realize later that it was incorrect. Numerous strategies are employed to deceive people, including manipulative advertisements by large corporations, businesses, and political entities. Such tactics have been employed for years.

To make the world a better place, there are three fundamental and straightforward actions one can take: to better oneself, to think critically, and to ask questions. By embracing these practices, we can navigate through the information overload and seek the truth beyond the surface. It is essential to be vigilant and discerning in an era where misinformation and manipulation are prevalent.

During Hitler's time, he employed a strategy to spread hate and falsehoods by disseminating enormous lies through various channels. By constantly repeating these lies, eventually lead some to believe them. Hitler also incorporated fragments of truth within these larger lies, making it appear credible when researchers discovered some accurate information. A similar phenomenon is occurring in the portrayal of the Indian state of Kerala.

Kerala is actually one of the most advanced and developed states in the Republic of India. However, due to the some political parties lack of success in the state, numerous false narratives about Kerala have been propagated. One recent example is a movie promoted by several party workers and leaders, which seeks to defame Kerala, the Muslim religion, and the women of Kerala. This film falsely portrays a phenomenon called "love jihad" and claims that around 32,000 women have been converted to Islam and recruited by ISIS, which is an absolute fabrication.

In reality, the official records show that only six women from Kerala joined ISIS, of which three were born Muslims, two converted from Christianity, and one from Hinduism. While the issue of recruiting individuals to ISIS is a grave concern and demands attention, the movie's plot wrongly depicts these conversions as forced. Instead, as a nation, India should unite to protect its citizens. It is essential to highlight the significant achievements of Indian intelligence agencies in preventing vulnerable youth from being radicalized, rather than promoting hate stories for political reasons. Compared to other countries, including European and American nations, India has been successful in curbing such recruitments, considering the size of its Muslim population. Several factors contribute to this success, including India's culture of unity in diversity, the values and teachings within individual Muslim households, and the perception of Indian Muslims by extremist groups, who view them as less rigid and more adaptable.

eyond political motivations, there are individuals who struggle to comprehend how people of different religions can peacefully coexist in Kerala and in several other states where the focus is on development and human well-being rather than divisive factors. This phenomenon extends beyond Kerala; it can be observed in numerous states where progress and human indices take precedence.

Kerala, along with other such states, serves as a prime example of harmonious living among people of diverse religious backgrounds. The region's longstanding history of communal harmony and tolerance has fostered an environment where individuals from various religions have peacefully resided together for generations. The state's unwavering commitment to education, healthcare, and social welfare has contributed to its high human development index and overall societal advancement. By prioritizing the betterment of society as a whole, people naturally emphasize cooperation, understanding, and mutual respect, irrespective of religious affiliations.

It is crucial to acknowledge and appreciate the achievements of these states in cultivating inclusive communities. Their emphasis on shared values, common goals, and the welfare of all citizens serves as a shining example for others to follow. By nurturing understanding and promoting harmonious coexistence, these states demonstrate that people of different religions can not only live together peacefully but also thrive. Such inclusive practices are not only possible but also essential for the growth and prosperity of any society.

It is natural for some states to lag behind others, and there is nothing inherently wrong with that. What's important is to acknowledge this reality and look to the states that are excelling as sources of inspiration and learning. States that are progressing at a faster pace can offer valuable insights and support to those that are relatively less developed, encompassing strategies, education, healthcare, psychological well-being, and social progress. However, the current practice we witness is that leaders of the less developed states often hinder their citizens from seeing the reality or may not even grasp it themselves.

It is disheartening to witness the plight of people in these states, who are being underutilized and left behind by at least 10 to 40 years compared to the advancing states. Another concerning issue is that leaders of these states frequently criticize the progressing states, only to later adopt their advancements. They expect other states to replicate what has been accomplished elsewhere while disparaging policies, food habits, culture, socio-psychological practices, and even the education system.

Instead of fostering a culture of constructive engagement and learning, this approach often perpetuates a sense of resentment and stagnation. It is crucial for leaders to encourage openness, collaboration, and a willingness to adapt and implement successful models from other states. By embracing progressive ideas and practices, all states can work together to bridge the development gap and uplift the entire nation.

When someone defames a state like Kerala and its women, they fail to recognize that women, regardless of religion, possess inner strength and agency. They cannot be forcefully converted through any form of so-called "love jihad." Women are capable individuals who can think critically and act according to their own wishes. It is important to stop underestimating the psychological resilience of women, not just in Kerala but worldwide.